Comment on "Magnetic phase transition in Co/Cu/Ni/Cu(100) and Co/Fe/Ni/Cu(100)"
P. J. Jensen, C. Sorg, A. Scherz, M. Bernien, K. Baberschke, and H., Wende

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of detailed quantitative analysis in magnetic phase transition studies of Co/Cu/Ni/Cu(100) and Co/Fe/Ni/Cu(100) trilayers, suggesting that existing experimental results can yield more insights when compared with suitable models.
Contribution
It highlights the need for comprehensive model-based analysis to extract key parameters from experimental data on magnetic phase transitions.
Findings
Published results can be further analyzed for more information.
Quantitative comparison with models can determine exchange coupling constants.
Enhanced analysis can improve understanding of magnetic interactions.
Abstract
In a recent Letter the phase diagram of Co/Cu/Ni/Cu(100) and Co/Fe/Ni/Cu(100) trilayers was determined experimentally as well as theoretically. Whereas we do not object the presented results, we remark that published work was not commented on. Especially, much more information can be extracted out of the measurements by a quantitative comparison with an appropriate model, allowing for a determination of important parameters such as exchange coupling constants.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
