Comparison of variational and CSE methods to polaron ground-state energy
Qing Chen, Ke-Lin Wang, Yi Wang

TL;DR
This paper compares variational and coherent-state expansion methods for calculating the polaron ground-state energy, showing that CSE simplifies calculations and is advantageous at higher orders, with both methods agreeing analytically within a certain accuracy.
Contribution
It demonstrates that CSE can simplify and improve higher-order approximations for polaron energy calculations compared to variational methods.
Findings
Both methods yield the same analytic expressions within $ ext{O}( ext{α}^2)$ accuracy.
CSE simplifies calculations significantly.
CSE shows advantages in higher-order approximations.
Abstract
Taking the same trial wave function, the ground-state energy of Fr\"{o}hlich polaron is investigated by variational method and coherent-state expansion (CSE) one, respectively. Within the accuracy to (the electron-phonon coupling constant), both methods can give the same analytic expressions of polaron ground-state energy as the function of electron-phonon coupling constant. We find that the CSE method can much simplify the calculation and shows more advantages in higher order approximations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Superconducting and THz Device Technology · Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
