Reply to "Comment on Universal Decoherence in Solids"
Eugene M. Chudnovsky
TL;DR
This paper defends the universality of a decoherence mechanism in solids against critiques, reaffirming its broad applicability in quantum physics.
Contribution
It clarifies that the critique does not undermine the universality of the decoherence mechanism previously proposed.
Findings
The critique does not affect the universality claim
Reaffirms the robustness of the decoherence mechanism
Supports the original findings against objections
Abstract
The Comment of Openov (PRL 93, 158901 (2004)) on my Physical Review Letter (PRL 92, 120405 (2004)) does not affect the universality of the decoherence mechanism described in the Letter.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.