Are defect models consistent with the entropy and specific heat of glass-formers?
G. Biroli, J. P. Bouchaud, G. Tarjus

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the point-like defect model of glasses, demonstrating its failure to explain thermodynamic properties like excess specific heat near the glass transition, and discusses more general defect models.
Contribution
The paper refutes the applicability of the point-like defect model for glasses and explores extended defect models as alternatives.
Findings
Point-like defect models cannot explain excess specific heat.
Extended defect models are discussed as more comprehensive alternatives.
The critique challenges previous claims supporting point-like defect explanations.
Abstract
We show that point-like defect model of glasses cannot explain thermodynamic properties of glass-formers, as for example the excess specific heat close to the glass transition, contrary to the claim of J.P. Garrahan, D. Chandler [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100, 9710 (2003)]. More general models and approaches in terms of extended defects are also discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
