Comment on "Competition between helimagnetism and commensurate quantum spin correlations in LiCu2O2"
S.-L. Drechsler, J. Malek, J. Richter, A.S. Moskvin, A.A. Gippius, and, H. Rosner

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous model of LiCu2O2's magnetic structure, proposing a more realistic single-chain frustrated model with specific exchange interactions, challenging earlier double-chain assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a revised single-chain frustrated magnetic model for LiCu2O2, replacing the previously assumed double-chain scenario, based on microscopic considerations.
Findings
The double-chain model is deemed unrealistic.
A single-chain model with ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic exchanges is proposed.
The new model better explains the observed helical structure.
Abstract
The microscopic origin of the recently observed helical structure in LiCu2O2 [1] is considered. It is shown that the frustrated antiferromagnetic double chain scenario adopted in Ref.1 is unrealistic. It should be replaced by a frustrated single-chain (CuO2) scenario proposed in Ref. 2 with ferromagnetic nearest neighbor and antiferromagnetic next nearest neighbor exchange integrals \. [1] T. Masuda et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004), 177201. [2] A. Gippius et al. Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004), R01426; cond-mat/0312576.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
