Glassy dynamics: mean-field `landscape' pictures versus growing length scale scenarii
Jean-Philippe Bouchaud

TL;DR
This paper reviews the compatibility of mean-field landscape theories with the concept of a growing cooperative length scale in understanding glassy dynamics, highlighting unresolved questions about glass non-flow.
Contribution
It clarifies the relationship between mean-field potential energy landscape models and real-space cooperative length scales in glass transition theories.
Findings
Mean-field theories naturally incorporate potential energy landscapes.
Growing length scales are essential to describe glassy slowing down.
Outstanding questions remain about the non-flow behavior of glasses.
Abstract
This is a short review on the compatibility between (a) mean-field, mode-coupling theories of the glass transition, where potential energy landscape ideas are natural, and (b) the necessity of describing the slowing down of glassy materials in terms of a growing cooperative length, absent from mean-field descriptions. We summarize some of the outstanding questions that remain before we can say we understand why glasses do not flow.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMaterial Dynamics and Properties · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Glass properties and applications
