Comment on "On the importance of the free energy for elasticity under pressure"
Gerd Steinle-Neumann, R. E. Cohen

TL;DR
This paper critiques a claim that Gibbs free energy is essential for calculating equilibrium structures and elastic constants under pressure, arguing that the statements made by Marcus et al. are incorrect.
Contribution
It clarifies misconceptions about the roles of Gibbs free energy and internal energy in determining equilibrium and elastic properties under pressure.
Findings
Marcus et al.'s claims are incorrect
Equilibrium structures can be derived from internal energy
Elastic constants are not solely determined by Gibbs free energy
Abstract
Marcus et al. (Marcus P, Ma H and Qiu S L 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 L525) claim that thermodynamic properties of materials under pressure must be computed using the Gibbs free energy , rather than the internal energy . Marcus et al. state that ``The minima of , but not of , give the equilibrium structure; the second derivatives of , but not of , with respect to strains at the equilibrium structure give the equilibrium elastic constants.'' Both statements are incorrect.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
