Comment on "Diffusion Monte Carlo study of jellium surfaces: Electronic densities and pair correlation functions"
J. M. Pitarke

TL;DR
This paper reanalyzes previous diffusion Monte Carlo data on jellium surfaces, showing that the surface energies are closer to local-density approximation predictions than initially reported, and that fixed-node errors may cancel out.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the fixed-node errors in earlier calculations likely cancel, leading to surface energy estimates that align more closely with LDA and RPA results.
Findings
Surface energies are closer to LDA predictions.
Fixed-node errors may cancel in slab and bulk calculations.
Results are in reasonable agreement with RPA.
Abstract
In a fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo calculation of the total energy of jellium slabs, Acioli and Ceperley [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, 17199 (1996)] reported jellium surface energies that at low electron densities were significantly higher than those predicted in the local-density approximation (LDA) of density-functional theory. Assuming that the fixed-node error in the slab and the bulk calculations cancel out, we show that their data yield surface energies that are considerably closer to the LDA and in reasonable agreement with those obtained in the random-phase approximation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
