Reply to Comment on "Roughness of Interfacial Crack Fronts: Stress-Weighted Percolation in the Damage Zone"
Jean Schmittbuhl, Alex Hansen, G. George Batrouni
TL;DR
This paper is a formal reply addressing a comment on a previous study about the roughness of interfacial crack fronts and the associated stress-weighted percolation in the damage zone.
Contribution
It clarifies and defends the original findings on crack front roughness and stress percolation against critiques, reaffirming the validity of the initial model.
Findings
Reaffirms the original model's validity
Addresses specific critiques raised in the comment
Supports the stress-weighted percolation framework
Abstract
This is the reply to a Comment by Alava and Zapperi (cond-mat/0401568) on Schmittbuhl, Hansen and Batrouni, PRL, 90, 045505 (2003).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.