Quasiparticle interference patterns as a test for the nature of the pseudogap phase in the cuprate superconductors
T. Pereg-Barnea (KITP, UBC), M. Franz (UBC)

TL;DR
This paper proposes using Fourier transform scanning tunneling spectroscopy (FT-STS) to distinguish the true nature of the pseudogap phase in cuprate superconductors by analyzing quasiparticle interference patterns, which reflect underlying electronic orders.
Contribution
It introduces a method to differentiate between superconducting remnants and competing orders as the origin of the pseudogap using FT-STS patterns and detailed numerical analysis.
Findings
FT-STS patterns contain signatures of the underlying electronic order.
Distinct differences in interference patterns can distinguish between pseudogap origins.
Next-generation FT-STS experiments can potentially identify the true nature of the pseudogap.
Abstract
Electrons, when scattered by static random disorder, form standing waves that can be imaged using scanning tunneling microscopy. Such interference patterns, observable by the recently developed technique of Fourier transform scanning tunneling spectroscopy (FT-STS), are shown to carry unique fingerprints characteristic of the electronic order present in a material. We exploit this feature of the FT-STS technique to propose a test for the nature of the enigmatic pseudogap phase in the high- cuprate superconductors. Through their sensitivity to the quasiparticle spectra and coherence factors, the FT-STS patterns in principle carry enough information to unambiguously determine the nature of the condensate responsible for the pseudogap phenomenon. We argue that the next generation of FT-STS experiments, currently underway, should be able to distinguish between the pseudogap dominated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
