A close look at Jeckelmann's weak-coupling results: Reply to the Comment by Jeckelmann

TL;DR

This paper critically examines Jeckelmann's weak-coupling results, highlighting issues and inaccuracies in his comment and revised comment, and emphasizes the need for corrections based on compelling evidence.

Contribution

The paper provides a detailed critique of Jeckelmann's weak-coupling results, revealing errors and misleading statements in his comments and responses.

Findings

Identified errors in Jeckelmann's original results

Highlighted misleading statements in his comments

Emphasized the need for corrections based on evidence

Abstract

We are pleased to see that Jeckelmann has made many changes to the original version of his comment on our paper as a result of our response. Here is a copy of this powerful response that reveals problems in his previous results. However, since this response was written before his revised comment came out, new issues in his new comment, which will be commented if necessary, are not discussed at present. Although some changes are made in his new comment as we suggested in the response, we still see many other new and old misleading statements and results. We kindly suggest the author correct them since evidence is very compelling.