International evidence on business cycle magnitude dependence
Corrado Di Guilmi, Edoardo Gaffeo, Mauro Gallegati, Antonio, Palestrini

TL;DR
This study investigates whether the likelihood of ending economic expansions and recessions depends on their size across 16 countries from 1881 to 2000, revealing different patterns for recessions and post-WWII expansions.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on magnitude dependence in business cycles using hazard models across a long historical period and multiple countries.
Findings
Recessions show positive magnitude dependence.
Expansions are generally magnitude independent, with negative dependence post-WWII.
Structural changes affect the dynamics of business cycle phases.
Abstract
Are expansions and recessions more likely to end as their magnitude increases? In this paper we apply parametric hazard models to investigate this issue in a sample of 16 countries from 1881 to 2000. For the total sample we find evidence of positive magnitude dependence for recessions, while for expansions we are not able to reject the null of magnitude independence. This last result is likely due to a structural change in the mechanism guiding expansions before and after the second World War. In particular, upturns show negative magnitude dependence in the post-World War II sub-sample, meaning that in this period expansions become less likely to end as their magnitude increases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMonetary Policy and Economic Impact · Global Financial Crisis and Policies · Market Dynamics and Volatility
