Finite-Difference and Pseudospectral Time-Domain Methods Applied to Backwards-Wave Metamaterials
Michael W. Feise, John B. Schneider, Peter J. Bevelacqua

TL;DR
This paper compares finite-difference and pseudospectral time-domain methods for simulating backwards-wave metamaterials, highlighting issues with numerical artifacts and accuracy in modeling dispersive properties crucial for imaging applications.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the pseudospectral method avoids artifacts present in finite-difference techniques and evaluates different dispersive modeling approaches for accurate simulation of backwards-wave materials.
Findings
Finite-difference time-domain suffers from numerical artifacts with BW materials.
Pseudospectral time-domain method avoids these artifacts due to collocated grids.
Certain dispersive modeling methods accurately predict the frequency of vanishing reflection.
Abstract
Backwards-wave (BW) materials that have simultaneously negative real parts of their electric permittivity and magnetic permeability can support waves where phase and power propagation occur in opposite directions. These materials were predicted to have many unusual electromagnetic properties, among them amplification of the near-field of a point source, which could lead to the perfect reconstruction of the source field in an image [J. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{85}, 3966 (2000)]. Often systems containing BW materials are simulated using the finite-difference time-domain technique. We show that this technique suffers from a numerical artifact due to its staggered grid that makes its use in simulations involving BW materials problematic. The pseudospectral time-domain technique, on the other hand, uses a collocated grid and is free of this artifact. It is also shown that when…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
