Comment on "Dynamic Wetting by liquids of different viscosity", by T.D. Blake and Y.D. Shikhmurzaev
Jens Eggers, Robert Evans

TL;DR
This paper critically analyzes a recent dynamic wetting theory based on interface formation, arguing that its treatment of surface tension and relaxation is physically flawed, thus questioning its validity.
Contribution
It provides a critical commentary highlighting flaws in the original model's physical assumptions regarding surface tension in dynamic wetting.
Findings
Identifies flaws in the treatment of surface tension
Questions the physical validity of the original model
Highlights the need for revised theoretical approaches
Abstract
We comment on a recent theory of dynamic wetting, that is based directly upon a model for interface formation, introduced by Shikhmurzaev. We argue that the treatment of surface tension and its relaxation, inherent in the original model, is physically flawed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Material Dynamics and Properties · Theoretical and Computational Physics
