Effects of next-nearest-neighbor hopping $t^{\prime}$ on the electronic structure of cuprates
K. Tanaka, T. Yoshida, A. Fujimori, D.H. Lu, Z.-X. Shen, X.-J. Zhou,, H. Eisaki, Z. Hussain, S. Uchida, Y. Aiura, K. Ono, T. Sugaya, T. Mizuno, and, I. Terasaki

TL;DR
This study compares photoemission spectra of different cuprate superconductors, revealing that the next-nearest-neighbor hopping parameter $|t^{\prime}|$ significantly influences their electronic structures and pseudogap behaviors.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the next-nearest-neighbor hopping $|t^{\prime}|$ varies among cuprates and impacts the pseudogap energy scale, providing new insights into their electronic properties.
Findings
BSCCO shows stronger dispersion in the lower-Hubbard band than LSCO.
The flat band at ${f k} extasciitilde$($\pi$,0) is deeper in BSCCO.
$|t^{\prime}|$ is larger in BSCCO than in LSCO and affects the pseudogap.
Abstract
Photoemission spectra of underdoped and lightly-doped BiPbSrCa{\it R}CuO ( Pr, Er) (BSCCO) have been measured and compared with those of LaSrCuO (LSCO). The lower-Hubbard band of the insulating BSCCO, like CaCuOCl, shows a stronger dispersion than LaCuO from () to (). The flat band at () is found generally deeper in BSCCO. These observations together with the Fermi-surface shapes and the chemical potential shifts indicate that the next-nearest-neighbor hopping of the single-band model is larger in BSCCO than in LSCO and that rather than the super-exchange influences the pseudogap energy scale.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
