Ultrametricity in Fund of Funds Diversification
Gabriele Susinno, Maria Augusta Miceli

TL;DR
This paper explores the use of ultrametricity and minimum spanning trees to analyze the similarity structure of hedge fund strategies, aiming to improve diversification and monitoring of actual versus declared strategies.
Contribution
It introduces a metric-based approach using MST to reveal hidden similarity structures among hedge funds, enhancing diversification strategies.
Findings
Ultrametricity helps identify strategy similarities.
MST reveals hidden relationships in hedge fund data.
Potential for improved fund of funds diversification.
Abstract
Minimum market transparency requirements impose Hedge Fund (HF) managers to use the statement declared strategy in practice. However each declared strategy may actually origin a multiplicity of implemented management decisions. Is then the "actual "strategy the same as the "announced" strategy? Can the actual strategy be monitored or compared to the actual strategy of HF belonging to the same "announced" class? Can the announced or actual strategy be used as a quantitative argument in the fund of funds policy? With the appropriate metric, it is possible to draw a minimum spanning tree (MST) to emphasize the similarity structure that could be hidden in raw correlation matrix of HF returns.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
