About "On certain incomplete statistics" by Lima et al
Michel Pezeril, Alain Le Mehaute, Qiuping A. Wang

TL;DR
The paper critiques Lima et al's claim about the entropy formula in incomplete statistics, arguing that their conclusion stems from an incorrect temperature definition, thus clarifying the proper form of the entropy.
Contribution
It clarifies the correct entropy formulation in incomplete statistics by identifying errors in previous temperature assumptions.
Findings
Lima et al's entropy formula is based on an erroneous temperature definition.
Correct formulation of entropy in incomplete statistics is different from previous claims.
The paper emphasizes proper temperature definition is crucial for accurate entropy calculation.
Abstract
Lima et al recently claim that ({\em Chaos, Solitons & Fractals,} 2004;19:1005)the entropy for the incomplete statistics based on the normalization should be instead of initially proposed by Wang. We indicate here that thisconclusion is a result of erroneous use of temperature definition for the incompletestatistics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
