Magnetic Field Effect on Static Antiferromagnetism in Electron-Doped Superconductor Pr$_{1-x}$LaCe$_x$CuO$_4$ ($x$=0.11 and 0.15)
M. Fujita, M. Matsuda, S. Katano, K. Yamada

TL;DR
This study investigates how magnetic fields influence static antiferromagnetic order in electron-doped Pr$_{1-x}$LaCe$_x$CuO$_4$ superconductors, revealing a peak in magnetic response near the phase boundary and contrasting behaviors in overdoped samples.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the magnetic field effects on static antiferromagnetism in electron-doped cuprates near the phase boundary, highlighting differences from hole-doped counterparts.
Findings
Magnetic field induces a peak in magnetic intensity at ~5 T in underdoped samples.
Overdoped samples show no static AF order even under magnetic fields up to 8.5 T.
Differences in field effects between electron- and hole-doped cuprates are discussed.
Abstract
Effects of magnetic fields (applied along the c-axis) on static spin correlation were studied for the electron-doped superconductors PrLaCeCuO with =0.11 (=26 K) and =0.15 (=16 K) by neutron scattering measurements. In the =0.11 sample located near the antiferromagnetic(AF) and superconducting phase boundary, the field dependence of both the magnetic intensity at T=3 K and the onset temperature of the magnetic order exhibits a peak at 5 T. In contrast, in the overdoped =0.15 sample a static AF order is neither observed at zero-field nor induced by the field up to 8.5 T. Difference and similarity of the field effect between the hole- and electron-doped high- cuprates are discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
