Stiffness Exponents for Lattice Spin Glasses in Dimensions d=3,...,6

TL;DR

This study determines the stiffness exponents for lattice spin glasses in dimensions 3 to 6 using bond-diluted lattices near the zero-temperature glass transition, achieving high accuracy through advanced finite-size scaling methods.

Contribution

It introduces an effective graph-reduction method for large diluted lattices and provides precise estimates of stiffness exponents across multiple dimensions.

Findings

Stiffness exponents increase with dimension from 0.24 to 1.1.

Scaling corrections are less problematic in diluted lattices.

Results support a mean-field value of 1 for the upper critical dimension.

Abstract

The stiffness exponents in the glass phase for lattice spin glasses in dimensions $d=3,...,6$ are determined. To this end, we consider bond-diluted lattices near the T=0 glass transition point $p^*$. This transition for discrete bond distributions occurs just above the bond percolation point $p_c$ in each dimension. Numerics suggests that both points, $p_c$ and $p^*$, seem to share the same $1/d$-expansion, at least for several leading orders, each starting with $1/(2d)$. Hence, these lattice graphs have average connectivities of $\alpha=2dp\gtrsim1$ near $p^*$ and exact graph-reduction methods become very effective in eliminating recursively all spins of connectivity $\leq3$, allowing the treatment of lattices of lengths up to L=30 and with up to $10^5-10^6$ spins. Using finite-size scaling, data for the defect energy width $\sigma(\Delta E)$ over a range of $p>p^*$ in each dimension can be combined to reach scaling regimes of about one decade in the scaling variable $L(p-p^*)^{\nu^*}$. Accordingly, unprecedented accuracy is obtained for the stiffness exponents compared to undiluted lattices ($p=1$), where scaling is far more limited. Surprisingly, scaling corrections typically are more benign for diluted lattices. We find in $d=3,...,6$ for the stiffness exponents $y_3=0.24(1)$, $y_4=0.61(2), y_5=0.88(5)$, and $y_6=1.1(1)$. The result for the upper critical dimension, $d_u=6$, suggest a mean-field value of $y_\infty=1$.