Superconductivity in Na$_x$CoO$_2$$\cdot$yH$_2$O : Is Spin-Charge Separation Protecting a d$_1$+id$_2$ State ?
Debanand Sa, Manas Sardar, G. Baskaran

TL;DR
This paper investigates the superconducting state in Na$_x$CoO$_2$$ullet$yH$_2$O, proposing that spin-charge separation may protect a d$_1$+id$_2$ wave state from disorder effects, unlike p or d-wave states.
Contribution
It introduces the idea that spin-charge decoupling acts as a quantum protectorate, safeguarding a specific d-wave superconducting state against disorder.
Findings
Disorder from Na$^+$ vacancies destroys p or d-wave superconductivity.
Experimental robustness suggests a spin-charge decoupling mechanism.
Calculated Knight shift and ${1ackslash T}_1$ align with RVB theory predictions.
Abstract
Superconductivity in NaCoOyHO is likely to be a p or d-wave; however, experiments are unable to pinpoint the symmetry. A simple estimate of pair breaking effects from an unavoidable `Na vacancy disorder' in an ordered Na lattice, at an optimal is shown to destroy a Fermi liquid based p or d-wave superconductivity. However, a robustness of superconducting and normal states, seen in experiments is pointed out and argued to imply presence of a `quantum protectorate', possibly a `spin-charge decoupling' that protects a d+id and not a p-state. A calculation of Knight shift and in the framework of RVB mean field theory and a fit to the data of Kobayashi [9] is made.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
