The origin of the difference in the superconducting critical temperatures of the beta_H and beta_L phases of (BEDT-TTF)_2I_3
B. J. Powell

TL;DR
This paper explains the difference in superconducting critical temperatures of two phases of (BEDT-TTF)_2I_3 by linking lattice fluctuations and molecular disorder to quasiparticle scattering, supported by theoretical calculations and experimental proposals.
Contribution
It introduces a parameter-free theory connecting molecular disorder, lattice fluctuations, and T_c differences in (BEDT-TTF)_2I_3 phases, with experimental validation plans.
Findings
Lattice fluctuations are present in the beta_L phase but absent in beta_H.
Disorder in ethylene groups increases quasiparticle scattering and lowers T_c.
Theoretical predictions align with experimental data.
Abstract
Incommensurate lattice fluctuations are present in the beta_L phase (T_c = 1.5 K) of ET_2I_3 (where ET is BEDT-TTF - bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene) but are absent in the beta_H phase (T_c = 7 K). We propose that the disorder in the conformational degrees of freedom of the terminal ethylene groups of the ET molecules, which is required to stabilise the lattice fluctuations, increases the quasiparticle scattering rate and that this leads to the observed difference in the superconducting critical temperatures, T_c, of the two phases. We calculate the dependence of T_c on the interlayer residual resistivity. Our theory has no free parameters. Our predictions are shown to be consistent with experiment. We describe experiments to conclusively test our hypothesis.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
