Comment on "Conservative force fields in nonextensive kinetic theory."
F.A. da Costa, M.D.S. de Meneses

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous work that improperly applied Maxwell-Boltzmann theory to an unrealistic model, arguing that the claimed problem and its proposed solution are not scientifically meaningful.
Contribution
It provides a critical commentary on the misuse of nonextensive kinetic theory in a specific context, emphasizing the importance of scientific rigor.
Findings
The original application was based on an unrealistic model.
The claimed problem does not exist in a meaningful physical context.
The critique highlights the importance of proper scientific standards.
Abstract
We discuss an improper application of the Maxwell-Boltzmann theory to a very unrealistic model. The authors of the original paper claim that a generalized theory would solve a problem that really does not exists. This Comment was submited to Physica A and was not accepted as it is. Although tecnically correct, we mantain ours view that such kind of "elementary exercises" would not deserve publication in any serious journal as Physica A.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Mechanics and Entropy · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
