Absence of Phase Stiffness in the Quantum Rotor Phase Glass
Philip Phillips, Denis Dalidovich

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the quantum rotor phase glass lacks phase stiffness and electromagnetic response, indicating it is not a superconductor but rather exhibits metallic behavior due to order parameter fluctuations.
Contribution
It provides a direct calculation showing the absence of phase stiffness in the quantum rotor phase glass, confirming its non-superconducting, metallic nature.
Findings
Quantum rotor phase glass has no electromagnetic response.
The system lacks phase stiffness, indicating non-superconductivity.
Results align with previous findings of metallic behavior in phase glasses.
Abstract
We analyze here the consequence of local rotational-symmetry breaking in the quantum spin (or phase) glass state of the quantum random rotor model. By coupling the spin glass order parameter directly to a vector potential, we are able to compute whether the system is resilient (that is, possesses a phase stiffness) to a uniform rotation in the presence of random anisotropy. We show explicitly that the O(2) vector spin glass has no electromagnetic response indicative of a superconductor at mean-field and beyond, suggesting the absence of phase stiffness. This result confirms our earlier finding (PRL, {\bf 89}, 27001 (2002)) that the phase glass is metallic, due to the main contribution to the conductivity arising from fluctuations of the superconducting order parameter. In addition, our finding that the spin stiffness vanishes in the quantum rotor glass is consistent with the absence of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
