Reply to C. Tsallis's "Comments on Critique of q-entropy for thermal statistics by M. Nauenberg"
M. Nauenberg

TL;DR
This paper defends the critique that nonextensive q-entropy formalism violates the zeroth law of thermodynamics and shows it does not correctly reproduce black-body radiation laws, countering Tsallis's comments.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous thermodynamic proof that nonextensive q-entropy fails to satisfy fundamental thermodynamic laws and does not reproduce the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
Findings
Q-entropy formalism violates the zeroth law of thermodynamics.
Application to black-body radiation does not yield the T^4 law.
Tsallis's comments do not address the main criticisms.
Abstract
In this note it is shown that in his ``Comments'', Tsallis did not point out any flaws in the main criticism of my paper, namely, that the nonextensive q-entropy formalism fails to satisfy the zeroth law of thermodynamics. Details are also given of a rigorous thermodynamic proof which demonstrates that, contrary to Tsallis's assertion, the application of a nonextensive formalism to black-body radiation does not lead to the well known Stefan-Boltzman law.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Mechanics and Entropy · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
