Polaron Crossover and Bipolaronic Metal-Insulator Transition in the half- filled Holstein model
M. Capone, S. Ciuchi

TL;DR
This paper investigates the transition from polaronic to bipolaronic states in the Holstein model, revealing that bipolaron formation drives the metal-insulator transition, using Dynamical Mean-Field Theory and various approximation methods.
Contribution
It distinguishes polaron crossover from bipolaron formation and compares exact DMFT solutions with perturbative and vertex correction approaches.
Findings
Polaron formation does not cause a metal-insulator transition.
Bipolaron formation is responsible for the transition.
Exact DMFT results differ from perturbative approximations.
Abstract
The formation of a finite density multipolaronic state is analyzed in the context of the Holstein model using the Dynamical Mean-Field Theory. The spinless and spinful fermion cases are compared to disentangle the polaron crossover from the bipolaron formation. The exact solution of Dynamical Mean-Field Theory is compared with weak-coupling perturbation theory, non-crossing (Migdal), and vertex correction approximations. We show that polaron formation is not associated to a metal-insulator transition, which is instead due to bipolaron formation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
