Does a Single Zealot Affect an Infinite Group of Voters ?
Mauro Mobilia

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how a single zealot influences opinion dynamics in an infinite voter model, revealing dimension-dependent convergence behaviors and the limits of influence in higher dimensions.
Contribution
It provides an exact solution for the magnetization in a voter model with a zealot, highlighting the influence decay with dimension and time.
Findings
In 1d, magnetization decays as t^{-1/2}.
In 2d, magnetization decays as 1/ln(t).
In higher dimensions, the zealot's influence is limited and does not reach all individuals.
Abstract
A method for studying exact properties of a class of {\it inhomogeneous} stochastic many-body systems is developed and presented in the framework of a voter model perturbed by the presence of a ``zealot'', an individual allowed to favour an opinion. We compute exactly the magnetization of this model and find that in one (1d) and two dimensions (2d) it evolves, algebraically () in 1d and much slower () in 2d, towards the unanimity state chosen by the zealot. In higher dimensions the stationary magnetization is no longer uniform: the zealot cannot influence all the individuals. Implications to other physical problems are also pointed out.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
