Breakdown of the Onsager principle as a sign of aging
Paolo Allegrini, Gerardo Aquino, Paolo Grigolini, Luigi Palatella,, Angelo Rosa

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between CTRW and GME under the Onsager principle, revealing that their equivalence holds only for exponential waiting times and exploring implications for aging and non-Markovian dynamics.
Contribution
It establishes conditions under which CTRW and GME are equivalent, highlighting the role of stationarity and aging, and introduces a non-Markovian GME consistent with the Onsager principle.
Findings
Equivalence between CTRW and GME holds only for exponential waiting times.
The Onsager principle is valid in fully aged systems regardless of waiting time distribution.
Non-Markovian GME can be consistent with the Onsager principle under stationarity.
Abstract
We discuss the problem of the equivalence between Continuous Time Random Walk (CTRW) and Generalized Master Equation (GME). The walker, making instantaneous jumps from one site of the lattice to another, resides in each site for extended times. The sojourn times have a distribution psi(t) that is assumed to be an inverse power law. We assume that the Onsager principle is fulfilled, and we use this assumption to establish a complete equivalence between GME and the Montroll-Weiss CTRW. We prove that this equivalence is confined to the case when psi(t) is an exponential. We argue that is so because the Montroll-Weiss CTRW, as recently proved by Barkai [E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 104101 (2003)], is non-stationary, thereby implying aging, while the Onsager principle, is valid only in the case of fully aged systems. We consider the case of a dichotomous fluctuation, and we prove that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
