Topology and Computational Performance of Attractor Neural Networks
Patrick N. Mcgraw, Michael Menzinger

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different network topologies, including regular, random, small-world, and scale-free, influence the computational efficiency and robustness of attractor neural networks, revealing unique advantages of scale-free structures.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of various network topologies on neural network performance, highlighting the robustness of scale-free networks in pattern recognition.
Findings
Random networks are most efficient for pattern storage and retrieval.
Scale-free networks exhibit robust partial recognition focused on highly connected nodes.
Network topology significantly affects neural network computational performance.
Abstract
To explore the relation between network structure and function, we studied the computational performance of Hopfield-type attractor neural nets with regular lattice, random, small-world and scale-free topologies. The random net is the most efficient for storage and retrieval of patterns by the entire network. However, in the scale-free case retrieval errors are not distributed uniformly: the portion of a pattern encoded by the subset of highly connected nodes is more robust and efficiently recognized than the rest of the pattern. The scale-free network thus achieves a very strong partial recognition. Implications for brain function and social dynamics are suggestive.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
