Reply to the Comment by M. Biskup, L. Chayes and R. Kotecky
K. Binder

TL;DR
This paper critically discusses Biskup et al.'s claim regarding the significance of conjugate thermodynamic variables in finite systems at fixed density, responding to their comment on the evaporation/condensation transition theory.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of the claim that conjugate thermodynamic variables lack physical significance in finite systems.
Findings
Rebuttal of Biskup et al.'s claim
Clarification of the role of thermodynamic variables in finite systems
Support for the original theory of evaporation/condensation transition
Abstract
In their comment to the paper ``Theory of the evaporation/condensation transition of equilibrium droplets in finite volumes'' [Physica A, 319, 99 (2003)], Biskup et al. claim that in finite systems at fixed density ``the physical significance of the conjugate thermodynamic variable is of dubious value''. This claim is critically discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
