Magnons in the half-doped manganites

TL;DR

This paper calculates magnon dispersion relations in half-doped manganites to distinguish between competing magnetic structure proposals, providing a method to experimentally identify the correct ground state configuration.

Contribution

It offers a theoretical comparison of magnon spectra for charge-ordered and dimer phases, suggesting experimental measurements can resolve their validity.

Findings

Magnon dispersion differs significantly between the two proposed structures.

Specific directions in the Brillouin zone show qualitative differences.

Measurement of these differences can identify the true magnetic ground state.

Abstract

Recently, based on the refined crystal structure of Pr0.6Ca0.4MnO3 from neutron diffraction, Daoud-Aladine et al.[PRL89,97205(2002)] have proposed a new ground state structure for the half-doped manganites R0.5Ca0.5MnO3, where R is a trivalent ion like Bi,La,Pr,Sm or Y. Their proposal describes the CE magnetic structure attributed to these materials as an arrangement of dimers along the ferromagnetic Mn zig-zag chains that form it. However, the dimers' proposal is in conflict with the Goodenough-Kanamori-Anderson rules, which give a coherent description of many transition metal insulating compounds and predict the coexistence of Mn3+ and Mn4+ ions in equal parts in the half-doped manganites. On the other hand, Rivadulla et al.[PRB 66, 174432 (2002)] have studied several single crystal samples of half-doped manganites and propose a phase diagram in terms of the tolerance factor which contains both types of structures. In the present work we have calculated the magnon dispersion relations for the CE magnetic structure, arising for each type of proposal: the charge ordered and the dimer phases, respectively. We consider a three-dimensional unit cell containing 16 spins, and compare the magnetic excitations along different paths in the first Brillouin zone. We conclude that measurement of the magnon dispersion relations should allow a clear distinction between the two proposals, predicting qualitative differences arising along specific directions of propagation in the first Brillouin zone.