The paper has been withdrawn due to very low reproducibility
H. H. Wen, H. P. Yang, X. F. Lu, J. Yan
TL;DR
This paper reports on the attempted reproducibility of a superconducting-like phenomenon, but the results were inconsistent, leading to its withdrawal due to very low reproducibility.
Contribution
It highlights the challenges of reproducibility in experimental physics and questions the validity of initial superconductivity claims.
Findings
Only 3 out of 100 samples showed superconducting-like behavior
Reproducibility was very low, casting doubt on initial results
The paper was withdrawn due to unreliable results
Abstract
The paper has been withdrawn due to very low reproducibility. About 100 samples have been made, only 3 samples show the superconducting-like behavior. We think it may be an unlikely result.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism