Sum rules and energy scales in the high-temperature superconductor YBa2Cu3O6+x
C. C. Homes, S. V. Dordevic, D. A. Bonn, Ruixing Liang, and W. N., Hardy

TL;DR
This study examines the energy scales involved in the superfluid density of YBa2Cu3O6+x superconductors, revealing different behaviors in optimally-doped and underdoped samples related to their normal state properties.
Contribution
It provides experimental evidence that the energy scale for superfluid spectral weight recovery differs significantly between optimally-doped and underdoped YBa2Cu3O6+x, linked to their normal state nature.
Findings
Sum rule obeyed in both materials within experimental accuracy.
Energy scale 800 cm in optimally doped, 5000 cm in underdoped.
Normal-state scattering rate is small, indicating non-dirty limit conditions.
Abstract
The Ferrell-Glover-Tinkham (FGT) sum rule has been applied to the temperature dependence of the in-plane optical conductivity of optimally-doped YBa_2Cu_3O_{6.95} and underdoped YBa_2Cu_3O_{6.60}. Within the accuracy of the experiment, the sum rule is obeyed in both materials. However, the energy scale \omega_c required to recover the full strength of the superfluid \rho_s in the two materials is dramatically different; \omega_c \simeq 800 cm^{-1} in the optimally doped system (close to twice the maximum of the superconducting gap, 2\Delta_0), but \omega_c \gtrsim 5000 cm^{-1} in the underdoped system. In both materials, the normal-state scattering rate close to the critical temperature is small, \Gamma < 2\Delta_0, so that the materials are not in the dirty limit and the relevant energy scale for \rho_s in a BCS material should be twice the energy gap. The FGT sum rule in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
