Luttinger Parameter g for Metallic Carbon Nanotubes and Related Systems
William Que

TL;DR
This paper uses RPA theory to derive the Luttinger parameter g for metallic carbon nanotubes, showing it is consistent across different nanotube types and affected minimally by gate voltage, validating RPA for plasmon energy calculations.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical derivation of the Luttinger parameter g for all metallic carbon nanotubes using RPA, highlighting its uniformity and applicability.
Findings
All metallic carbon nanotubes have the same g value.
A carbon peapod has a smaller g than a nanotube.
Gate voltage has a second order effect on g.
Abstract
The random phase approximation (RPA) theory is used to derive the Luttinger parameter g for metallic carbon nanotubes. The results are consistent with the Tomonaga-Luttinger models. All metallic carbon nanotubes, regardless if they are armchair tubes, zigzag tubes, or chiral tubes, should have the same Luttinger parameter g. However, a (10,10) carbon peapod should have a smaller g value than a (10,10) carbon nanotube. Changing the Fermi level by applying a gate voltage has only a second order effect on the g value. RPA theory is a valid approach to calculate plasmon energy in carbon nanotube systems, regardless if the ground state is a Luttinger liquid or Fermi liquid. (This paper was published in PRB 66, 193405 (2002). However, Eqs. (6), (9), and (19) were misprinted there.)
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
