Comment on "Spontaneous breaking of time-reversal symmetry in the pseudogap state of a high-T$_c$ superconductor"
N.P. Armitage (UCLA), Jiangping Hu (UCLA)

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent experiment claiming evidence of time-reversal symmetry breaking in a high-Tc superconductor, suggesting that overlooked temperature-dependent structural changes could invalidate the original conclusions.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis highlighting potential overlooked factors affecting the interpretation of experimental results on symmetry breaking.
Findings
Small temperature-dependent structural changes may influence photoemission results
Overlooked superstructure variations could invalidate claims of symmetry breaking
Critical review of experimental methodology and interpretation
Abstract
We argue that that in their recent experiment in which they claim to have found evidence for a time-reversal symmetry broken state, Kaminski et al. overlooked small temperature dependent changes in the superstructure of Bi2212. These subtle changes may manifest themselves by changing the final state configurations of the photoemission process and thus invalidate their ultimate conclusions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Iron-based superconductors research · Rare-earth and actinide compounds
