Electronic structure, exchange interactions and Curie temperature in diluted III-V magnetic semiconductors: (GaCr)As, (GaMn)As, (GaFe)As
L.M. Sandratskii, P. Bruno

TL;DR
This study compares the electronic structure and magnetic properties of (GaCr)As, (GaMn)As, and (GaFe)As, revealing similarities between the first two and fundamental differences with (GaFe)As, especially regarding ferromagnetism and potential spintronic applications.
Contribution
It extends previous research by analyzing (GaCr)As and (GaFe)As, highlighting their electronic and magnetic behaviors and differences from (GaMn)As, especially in relation to ferromagnetism and defect sensitivity.
Findings
(GaCr)As and (GaMn)As are semi-metallic and ferromagnetic with similar Curie temperatures.
Ferromagnetism in (GaMn)As is highly sensitive to donor defects.
(GaFe)As does not exhibit ferromagnetism or half-metallicity, limiting spintronic use.
Abstract
We complete our earlier (Phys. Rev. B, {\bf 66}, 134435 (2002)) study of the electronic structure, exchange interactions and Curie temperature in (GaMn)As and extend the study to two other diluted magnetic semiconductors (GaCr)As and (GaFe)As. Four concentrations of the 3d impurities are studied: 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, 3.125%. (GaCr)As and (GaMn)As are found to possess a number of similar features. Both are semi-metallic and ferromagnetic, with similar properties of the interatomic exchange interactions and the same scale of the Curie temperature. In both systems the presence of the charge carriers is crucial for establishing the ferromagnetic order. An important difference between two systems is in the character of the dependence on the variation of the number of carriers. The ferromagnetism in (GaMn)As is found to be very sensitive to the presence of the donor defects, like As…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
