Phase Diagram for the Constrained Integer Partitioning Problem
C. Borgs, J.T. Chayes, S. Mertens, B. Pittel

TL;DR
This paper rigorously characterizes the typical behavior of the constrained integer partitioning problem, revealing three distinct phases in the parameter space based on the discrepancy and number of solutions.
Contribution
It establishes a phase diagram for the problem, identifying perfect, hard, and sorted phases, and relates these to linear programming solutions and subproblem partitions.
Findings
Three phases characterized by discrepancy and solution count
Existence of a perfect phase with many optimal solutions
Unique sorted phase with a single optimal partition
Abstract
We consider the problem of partitioning integers into two subsets of given cardinalities such that the discrepancy, the absolute value of the difference of their sums, is minimized. The integers are i.i.d. random variables chosen uniformly from the set . We study how the typical behavior of the optimal partition depends on and the bias , the difference between the cardinalities of the two subsets in the partition. In particular, we rigorously establish this typical behavior as a function of the two parameters and by proving the existence of three distinct ``phases'' in the -plane, characterized by the value of the discrepancy and the number of optimal solutions: a ``perfect phase'' with exponentially many optimal solutions with discrepancy 0 or 1; a ``hard phase'' with minimal discrepancy of order ;…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Approximation and Integration · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
