Significance of log-periodic signatures in cumulative noise
Hans-Christian Graf v. Bothmer

TL;DR
This paper introduces a cumulative Lomb periodogram method to detect and assess the significance of log-periodic signatures in financial market noise, specifically applied to the S&P 500 anti-bubble starting in 2000.
Contribution
It develops a cumulative version of the Lomb periodogram that provides frequency-independent significance testing for log-periodic signals in cumulative noise.
Findings
Successfully applied to S&P 500 data from 2000
Demonstrates the method's ability to identify log-periodic signatures
Provides a statistical significance framework for such signatures
Abstract
Using methods introduced by Scargle in 1978 we derive a cumulative version of the Lomb periodogram that exhibits frequency independent statistics when applied to cumulative noise. We show how this cumulative Lomb periodogram allows us to estimate the significance of log-periodic signatures in the S&P 500 anti-bubble that started in August 2000.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling · Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes · Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
