Quasicrystals: A matter of definition
Ron Lifshitz

TL;DR
This paper challenges the traditional definition of quasicrystals, proposing that structures without forbidden symmetries should also be considered quasicrystals, broadening the scope of what is recognized as such.
Contribution
It introduces a revised definition of quasicrystals that includes structures lacking forbidden symmetries, expanding the understanding of quasicrystalline matter.
Findings
Traditional definition excludes some quasicrystals.
Structures without forbidden symmetries exhibit quasicrystal properties.
Proposes a more inclusive definition of quasicrystals.
Abstract
It is argued that the prevailing definition of quasicrystals, requiring them to contain an axis of symmetry that is forbidden in periodic crystals, is inadequate. This definition is too restrictive in that it excludes an important and interesting collection of structures that exhibit all the well-known properties of quasicrystals without possessing any forbidden symmetries.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
