Comments on ``Coexistence of Composite Bosons and Composite Fermions in Quantum Hall Bilayers", Simon et al, cond-mat/0301203
Keshav N. Shrivastava

TL;DR
This paper critically examines Simon et al's claims about composite fermions and bosons in quantum Hall bilayers, arguing that their proposed transitions and assumptions are inconsistent with experimental data and physical constraints.
Contribution
The authors refute the possibility of CF to CB transition in GaAs and challenge the assumptions about quasiparticle conservation and formation energy, providing a more accurate interpretation of experimental results.
Findings
CF to CB transition is not feasible in GaAs
Computed CF mass exceeds experimental values
Quasiparticle number conservation is not necessary
Abstract
Simon et al suggest that composite fermions (CF) must be replaced by composite bosons (CB) and "111" state is a boson state. However, we find that such a transition in real GaAs is not possible and CF state cannot become a boson. Simon et al suggest that the total number of CF and CB is conserved. However, we find that the number of quasiparticles need not be conserved. Similarly, Simon et al suggest that CFs are formed but we find that this formation does not conserve energy so that CFs will not be formed. Simon et al compute using products of fermion and boson wave functions. We find that the mass of the CF is much too larger than experimental mass. We find that these computed results are not in agreement with the data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
