Ultrasonic Attenuation in Clean d-Wave Superconductors

TL;DR

This paper calculates the ultrasonic attenuation in clean d-wave superconductors at low temperatures, considering previously ignored processes involving quasi-particles, and compares their contributions in different temperature regimes and directions.

Contribution

It introduces the calculation of quasi-hole pair excitation processes' contribution to ultrasonic attenuation in d-wave superconductors, which were previously neglected.

Findings

Contribution proportional to T in ultra-low temperature regime.

Contribution proportional to 1/T in low temperature regime.

Differences in process contributions along nodal and antinodal directions.

Abstract

We calculate the low temperature longitudinal ultrasonic attenuation rate $\alpha_S$ in clean d-wave superconductors. We consider the contribution of previously ignored processes involving the excitation of a pair of quasi-holes or quasi-particles. These processes, which are forbidden by energy conservation in conventional s-wave superconductors, have a finite phase space in d-wave superconductors due to the presence of nodes in the gap which give rise to soft low-energy electronic excitations. We find the contribution to $\alpha_S$ from these processes to be proportional to $T$ in the regime $k_B T\ll Qv_{\Delta} \ll \Delta_0$,(ultra-low temperature regime) and to be proportional to 1/T in the region $Qv_F \ll k_BT \ll \Delta_0$, (low temperature regime) where ${\bf Q}$ is the ultrasound wave-vector and $\Delta_0$ is the maximum gap amplitude. We explicitly evaluate these terms, for parameters appropriate to the cuprates, for ${\bf Q}$ along the nodal and the antinodal directions and compare it with the contribution from processes considered earlier(I.Vekhter et al {\it Phys. Rev.}{\bf B59}, 7123(1999)). In the ultra-low temperature regime, the processes considered by us make a contribution which is smaller by about a factor of 10 for ${\bf Q}$ along the nodal direction, while along the antinodal direction it is larger by a factor of 100 or so. In the low temperature regime on the other hand the contribution made by these terms is small. However taken together with the original terms we describe a possible way to evaluate the parameter $v_F/v_\Delta$.