Simulations of amphiphilic fluids using mesoscale lattice-Boltzmann and lattice-gas methods
P.J. Love, M. Nekovee, J. Chin, N. Gonzalez-Segredo, and P.V. Coveney

TL;DR
This paper compares two mesoscale models for simulating amphiphilic fluids, focusing on their algorithms, stability, parallel performance, visualization, and potential future improvements.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of lattice-Boltzmann and lattice-gas models for amphiphilic fluids, including implementation, performance, and visualization techniques.
Findings
Both models are suitable for large-scale parallel simulations.
Parallelization strategies differ and impact performance.
Visualization and computational steering enhance data interpretation.
Abstract
We compare two recently developed mesoscale models of binary immiscible and ternary amphiphilic fluids. We describe and compare the algorithms in detail and discuss their stability properties. The simulation results for the cases of self-assembly of ternary droplet phases and binary water-amphiphile sponge phases are compared and discussed. Both models require parallel implementation and deployment on large scale parallel computing resources in order to achieve reasonable simulation times for three-dimensional models. The parallelisation strategies and performance on two distinct parallel architectures are compared and discussed. Large scale three dimensional simulations of multiphase fluids requires the extensive use of high performance visualisation techniques in order to enable the large quantities of complex data to be interpreted. We report on our experiences with two commercial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
