Comment on ``BCS to Bose-Einstein crossover phase diagram at zero temperature for a d_{x^2-y^2} order parameter superconductor: Dependence on the tight-binding structure''
A. Perali, P. Pieri, G. C. Strinati

TL;DR
This paper challenges previous claims by showing that in a 2D attractive Hubbard model with d-wave pairing, a non-pairing region does not exist, and the gap remains finite for all non-zero densities and couplings.
Contribution
It provides analytical and numerical evidence that contradicts earlier work, demonstrating continuous pairing without non-pairing regions in the phase diagram.
Findings
No non-pairing region in the phase diagram.
Finite gap at T=0 for all non-zero densities and couplings.
Contradicts previous claims of a non-pairing region.
Abstract
The work by Soares et al. [Phys. Rev. B 65, 174506 (2002)] investigates the BCS-BE crossover for d-wave pairing in the 2-dimensional attractive Hubbard model. Contrary to their claims, we found that a non-pairing region does not exist in the density vs coupling phase diagram. The gap parameter at T=0, as obtained by solving analytically as well as numerically the BCS equations, is in fact finite for any non-zero density and coupling, even in the weak-coupling regime.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
