Role of bulk and of interface contacts in the behaviour of model dimeric proteins
G. Tiana, D. Provasi, R. A. Broglia

TL;DR
This paper investigates how bulk and interface contacts influence the folding mechanisms of dimeric proteins using a minimal lattice model, revealing distinct roles and evolutionary implications for different dimer types.
Contribution
It distinguishes between three-state and two-state dimer folding mechanisms based on contact energy partitioning and contact topology, providing insights into their folding pathways and evolution.
Findings
Three-state dimers fold via hierarchical pathways controlled by local structures.
Two-state dimers stabilize through interface assembly, leading to chain folding.
Three-state dimers' properties are more evolutionarily robust, impacting viral protein studies.
Abstract
Some dimeric proteins first fold and then dimerize (three--state dimers) while others first dimerize and then fold (two--state dimers). Within the framework of a minimal lattice model, we can distinguish between sequences obeying to one or to the other mechanism on the basis of the partition of the ground state energy between bulk than for interface contacts. The topology of contacts is very different for the bulk than for the interface: while the bulk displays a rich network of interactions, the dimer interface is built up a set of essentially independent contacts. Consequently, the two sets of interactions play very different roles both in the the folding and in the evolutionary history of the protein. Three--state dimers, where a large fraction of the energy is concentrated in few contacts buried in the bulk, and where the relative contact energy of interface contacts is considerably…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
