Role of scattering in nanotransistors
Alexei Svizhenko, M. P. Anantram

TL;DR
This paper models scattering effects in nanotransistors, revealing that scattering along the entire channel impacts current similarly when channel length is comparable to scattering length, challenging traditional assumptions about source-end scattering.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed model of scattering effects in nanotransistors, showing the non-uniform impact along the channel and invalidating the simple series resistance approximation.
Findings
Scattering in the right half of the channel affects drain current similarly to the left half when channel length ≈ scattering length.
Scattering near the drain is less detrimental than near the source when channel length >> scattering length.
Classical models of extension regions as simple resistances are not valid for nanotransistors.
Abstract
We model the influence of scattering along the channel and extension regions of dual gate nanotransistor. It is found that the reduction in drain current due to scattering in the right half of the channel is comparable to the reduction in drain current due to scattering in the left half of the channel, when the channel length is comparable to the scattering length. This is in contrast to a popular belief that scattering in the source end of a nanotransistor is significantly more detrimental to the drive current than scattering elsewhere. As the channel length becomes much larger than the scattering length, scattering in the drain-end is less detrimental to the drive current than scattering near the source-end of the channel. Finally, we show that for nanotransistors, the classical picture of modeling the extension regions as simple series resistances is not valid.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
