Competing tunneling trajectories in a 2D potential with variable topology as a model for quantum bifurcations
V.A. Benderskii, E.V. Vetoshkin (Institute of Problems of Chemical, Physics, RAS, Chernogolovka, Russia), E.I. Kats (Laue-Langevin Institute,, Grenoble, France), and L.D. Landau (Institute for Theoretical Physics, RAS,, Moscow, Russia)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a path-integral method to analyze quantum tunneling in a 2D potential with variable topology, revealing crossover and first-order transitions influenced by saddle point inequivalence.
Contribution
The study develops a general path-integral approach to quantum bifurcations in 2D systems, accounting for fluctuations and topology changes, applicable across physics and chemistry.
Findings
Identified crossover behavior due to zero point fluctuations.
Demonstrated first-order transition when saddle points are inequivalent.
Validated the approach with numerical simulations.
Abstract
We present a path - integral approach to treat a 2D model of a quantum bifurcation. The model potential has two equivalent minima separated by one or two saddle points, depending on the value of a continuous parameter. Tunneling is therefore realized either along one trajectory or along two equivalent paths. Zero point fluctuations smear out the sharp transition between these two regimes and lead to a certain crossover behavior. When the two saddle points are inequivalent one can also have a first order transition related to the fact that one of the two trajectories becomes unstable. We illustrate these results by numerical investigations. Even though a specific model is investigated here, the approach is quite general and has potential applicability for various systems in physics and chemistry exhibiting multi-stability and tunneling phenomena.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
