Universal relaxor polarization in Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 and related materials
A.A. Bokov, Z.-G. Ye

TL;DR
This study reveals a universal relaxor polarization behavior across different compositions of Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-based relaxor ferroelectrics, characterized by a fractional power frequency dependence and a quadratic divergence of susceptibility.
Contribution
It introduces a microscopic model explaining the universal relaxor susceptibility as polarization of polar nanoregions with freely choosing dipole orientations, supported by a spherical model analysis.
Findings
Universal relaxor dispersion exists in multiple compositions.
Susceptibility shows quadratic divergence above Tm.
Real part of susceptibility is small, but imaginary part dominates losses.
Abstract
The dielectric permittivity e at frequencies from [10^(-1) -10^(-5)] Hz to 10^5 Hz is studied in perovskite (1-x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 - xPbTiO3 relaxor ferroelectric ceramics of different compositions x = 0.35, 0.25 and 0, which exhibit, below the temperature of the diffuse epsilon'(T) maximum Tm, a tetragonal ferroelectric, a rhombohedral ferroelectric and a nonergodic relaxor phase, respectively. The universal relaxor dispersion previously observed at temperatures near and above Tm in the ceramics of x=0.25, is also found to exist in other compositions. This dispersion is described by the fractional power dependence of the real and imaginary parts of susceptibility on frequency. The real part of the universal relaxor susceptibility chi'U is only a comparatively small fraction of the total permittivity epsilon', but chi"U is the dominant contribution to the losses in a wide…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
