Winning combinations of history-dependent games
Roland J. Kay, Neil F. Johnson

TL;DR
This paper extends the understanding of the Parrondo effect by analyzing how two history-dependent, memory-involving games can combine to produce winning outcomes, with new results for random and periodic switching scenarios.
Contribution
It generalizes the Parrondo effect to include history-dependent games and explores the impact of different switching strategies on the paradoxical outcome.
Findings
History-dependent games can exhibit Parrondo effect under various switching schemes
Random switching can lead to winning combinations in history-dependent games
Periodic switching also produces paradoxical winning outcomes
Abstract
The Parrondo effect describes the seemingly paradoxical situation in which two losing games can, when combined, become winning [Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 24 (2000)]. Here we generalize this analysis to the case where both games are history-dependent, i.e. there is an intrinsic memory in the dynamics of each game. New results are presented for the cases of both random and periodic switching between the two games.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
