Geography in a Scale-Free Network Model
C.P. Warren, L.M. Sander, I.M. Sokolov

TL;DR
This paper introduces a scale-free network model with geographic structure, showing it has a nonzero percolation threshold, which impacts disease spread and immunization strategies.
Contribution
It presents a lattice-based scale-free network model with geography, demonstrating a nonzero percolation threshold unlike traditional models.
Findings
Nonzero percolation threshold for alpha>2
Geography influences disease spread thresholds
Small-world links do not eliminate thresholds
Abstract
We offer an example of an network model with a power law degree distribution, P(k) ~ k^{-alpha}, for nodes but which nevertheless has a well-defined geography and a nonzero threshold percolation probability for alpha>2, the range of real-world contact networks. This is different from the p_c=0 for alpha<3 results for well-mixed scale-free networks. In our lattice-based scale-free network, individuals link to nearby neighbors on a lattice. Even considerable additional small-world links do not change our conclusion of nonzero thresholds. When applied to disease propagation, these results suggest that random immunization may be more successful in controlling human epidemics than previously suggested if there is geographical clustering.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
