Different routes to charge disproportionation in perovskites-type Fe oxides
J. Matsuno, T.Mizokawa, A. Fujimori, Y. Takeda, S. Kawasaki, M. Takano

TL;DR
This study compares charge disproportionation mechanisms in iron perovskites CaFeO_3 and La_{0.33}Sr_{0.67}FeO_3, revealing different roles of lattice distortions in inducing charge order.
Contribution
It demonstrates that lattice distortions are essential for charge disproportionation in CaFeO_3 but not in La_{0.33}Sr_{0.67}FeO_3, highlighting different routes to charge ordering.
Findings
Spectral weight decreases near Fermi level with cooling in both materials.
Lattice distortion occurs only in CaFeO_3.
Breathing and tilting distortions are needed for CaFeO_3's charge disproportionation.
Abstract
Iron perovskites CaFeO_3 and La_{0.33}Sr_{0.67}FeO_3 show charge disproportionation, resulting in charge-ordered states with Fe^{3+}:Fe^{5+} =1:1 and =2:1, respectively. We have made photoemission and unrestricted Hartree-Fock band-structure calculation of CaFeO_3 and compared it with La_{0.33}Sr_{0.67}FeO_3. With decreasing temperature, a gradual decrease of the spectral weight near the Fermi level occurred in CaFeO_3 as in La_{0.33}Sr_{0.67}FeO_3 although lattice distortion occurs only in CaFeO_3. Hartree-Fock calculations have indicated that both the breathing and tilting distortions are necessary to induce the charge disproportionation in CaFeO_3, while no lattice distortion is necessary for the charge disproportionation in La_{0.33}Sr_{0.67}FeO_3.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
