Nonlinear Impurity in a Lattice: Dispersion Effects
M. I. Molina

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how second-nearest-neighbor hopping influences bound state formation in a one-dimensional nonlinear lattice, revealing that increased dispersion facilitates bound states at lower nonlinearity levels.
Contribution
It provides a closed-form solution for bound states in a nonlinear impurity model with extended hopping, highlighting the role of second-nearest-neighbor interactions in bound state formation.
Findings
Second-nearest-neighbor hopping lowers the nonlinearity threshold for bound states.
A phase diagram maps bound state existence as a function of nonlinearity and hopping ratios.
Enhanced dispersion enables earlier self-trapping transitions in the lattice.
Abstract
We examine the bound state(s) associated with a single cubic nonlinear impurity, in a one-dimensional tight-binding lattice, where hopping to first--and--second nearest neighbors is allowed. The model is solved in closed form {\em v\`{\i}a} the use of the appropriate lattice Green function and a phase diagram is obtained showing the number of bound states as a function of nonlinearity strength and the ratio of second to first nearest--neighbor hopping parameters. Surprisingly, a finite amount of hopping to second nearest neighbors helps the formation of a bound state at smaller (even vanishingly small) nonlinearity values. As a consequence, the selftrapping transition can also be tuned to occur at relatively small nonlinearity strength, by this increase in the lattice dispersion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
